Correction

Thanks to the ‘Cornishman’ who spotted a mistake in the legend of the spreadsheet. (‘Deferment PV’ was wrongly labelled as ‘Loan PV’ and conversely. Now fixed, hopefully, together with some other minor fixes.

Eumaeus will be a little quieter over the next few weeks, as there is stuff going on that we can’t publish, at least for now. But there will be more to come!

A very arcane Rule

I just discovered the fabulous Commons TV feature that allows you to link directly to the time you wanted, rather than fumble about with the cursor all night.

So here is Nicky Morgan giving a light grilling, and tbh it’s very light, to David Rule, director of insurance at the PRA.  In which David coins a new verb ‘to dividend’.

My transcript below for those who lack the patience to watch it through.

[EDIT] Full transcript is now here.

Continue reading “A very arcane Rule”

NoCA presentation

The NoCA talk scheduled for tomorrow has already been uploaded here. I will be talking through the slides for about 40 minutes, but there will be plenty of time for questions afterwards.

For those who like spreadsheets, our work in progress is here, which values an ERM using the Cairns-Blake-Dowd model. There are 6 stress tests given on slide 12 which are consistent with the spreadsheet. Please report any errors, questions etc. through the contact form.

Looking forward to discussing tomorrow.

The deferment rate in Sunderland

As part of my work with the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership I am looking at how the deferment rate used in leasehold tribunal decisions  can be estimated using market data.

It already seems, see my previous post on this, that the rental-implied deferment rate changes through time, to my initial surprise. But it is equally surprising that there are considerable regional variations.

Continue reading “The deferment rate in Sunderland”

Dates for diary

1.  As advertised earlier, I will be presenting ‘The Valuation of Equity Release Mortgages’, to the Network of Consulting Actuaries. All welcome.

2. On Friday 8 February I will be presenting ‘Routing around malfunction: can the financial system ever be open?’ Booking form here.

Jimmy Wales (founder of Wikipedia and campaigner for an open knowledge society) once claimed that “The internet interprets any type of centralized planning as a malfunction and routes around it. The command-and-control model is doomed to failure here by the very nature of the network. This is inevitable”. Many of the pioneers of open data, such as Tim Berners-Lee and Richard Stallman, have shared this vision.

Yet the world of finance is still predicated on the command-and-control model. A small number of giant banks control the market in commercial and retail lending, the insurance world is dominated by a handful of large players, who alone have access to the corridors of central banks and regulators.

Dean Buckner, a retired specialist at the Bank of England, explains how the secretive nature of regulation threatens, rather than supports, the stability of the financial system.

3. I will be speaking at the InsuranceERM conference on 27 February. Details here.

Elephant in the room: IFRS 17 and the matching adjustment

Solvency II was originally a market consistent regime for the regulatory balance sheet, and much of its original wording followed IFRS standards. This was since watered down by an addendum to Article 77 of the Solvency II directive, known as ‘Matching Adjustment’. IFRS 17 has a similar provision to Article 77, but has much stronger standards on market consistency. Will this lead to a divergence between regulatory and statutory balance sheets? Could there be a serious impact on UK insurers? The presentation will cover

  • History of Solvency II and Matching Adjustment
  • Corresponding provisions in IFRS 17
  • Potential divergence of regulatory and statutory reporting
  • Scenarios for reported solvency of UK insurers

It moves

Geeks only. The chart above shows (blue line) UK house price index from 1969 to date, January 1969 = 100, (red line) UK nominal rentals also indexed from 1969, and (green line) the deferment  rate implied by these numbers, with base case an assumed net rental yield of 2.6% in 2018, using data sourced from Zoopla, assumptions about management and maintenance costs etc., and a formula derived from Gordon’s dividend discount model.

This shows that the deferment rate – the rate that drives both the cost of leasehold enfranchisement and the cost of the No Negative Equity Guarantee embedded in Equity Release Mortgages, changes through time, rather than staying roughly constant.

This has significant policy implications.

Continue reading “It moves”